The former US ambassador to Ukraine has told lawmakers she was sacked over “unfounded and false claims by people with clearly questionable motives”.
Marie Yovanovitch said she was “incredulous” at being dismissed by President Donald Trump in May.
Her testimony is part of an impeachment inquiry against the US president.
The Democratic probe is looking into whether Mr Trump improperly pressured Ukraine to investigate his political rival Joe Biden.
It was sparked by a whistleblower complaint about a July phone call between the Republican president and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky.
During that conversation, Mr Trump described Ms Yovanovitch as “bad news”, according to a rough transcript released by the White House.
The decision to dismiss her several months earlier reportedly followed the US president’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and other conservatives arguing she was biased against the president.
Democrats believe she was ousted, in part, because she insisted that requests from Mr Giuliani to Ukrainian officials for an investigation into Mr Biden should be relayed through official channels, the BBC’s Gary O’Donoghue in Washington says.
Media playback is unsupported on your device
Mr Giuliani had been working in Ukraine to press the authorities to investigate widely debunked corruption allegations against Mr Biden, and his son, Hunter, who was associated with a Ukrainian company.
Mr Giuliani is coming under increasing scrutiny over his work for the president. Asked by reporters on Friday if Mr Giuliani was still his lawyer, Mr Trump answered ambiguously: “I don’t know. He’s a very good attorney and he has been my attorney.”
What did the ambassador say?
“Although I understand that I served at the pleasure of the president,” Ms Yovanovitch said in a prepared statement, “I was nevertheless incredulous that the US government chose to remove an ambassador based, as best as I can tell, on unfounded and false claims by people with clearly questionable motives.”
She said she did not know Mr Giuliani’s reasons for attacking her.
- The Trump impeachment story explained
- Who’s who in Trump whistleblower story?
“Equally fictitious is the notion that I am disloyal to President Trump,” Ms Yovanovitch said. “I have heard the allegation in the media that I supposedly told the embassy team to ignore the president’s orders ‘since he was going to be impeached.’ That allegation is false.”
In her prepared remarks, the 33-year veteran of the foreign service and three-time ambassador delivered a blistering rebuke to a US State Department “attacked and hollowed from within” where “private interests circumvent professional diplomats for their own gain, not the public good”.
She warned of the harm that will come to the US when “bad actors” realise “how easy it is to use fiction and innuendo to manipulate our system”.
Ms Yovanovitch said she had never met or spoken with Hunter Biden and that Joe Biden had never raised with her the subject of his son or the Ukrainian gas firm that employed him.
She also said she learned that Mr Trump had called for her ousting since 2018 despite Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan telling her she had done nothing wrong.
“He said that the president had lost confidence in me and no longer wished me to serve as his ambassador. He added that there had been a concerted campaign against me,” Ms Yovanovitch said.
A Barack Obama-appointee, Ms Yovanovitch was confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate and served as US ambassador to Ukraine from August 2016 until last May.
The whistleblower complaint noted her surprise dismissal was a red flag for some officials.
Media playback is unsupported on your device
- Trump donors charged in campaign finance case
Who else has been called to testify?
House Democrats also heard earlier this month from Ukraine Special Envoy Kurt Volker.
He revealed text messages between US diplomats documenting the Trump administration’s efforts to have Ukraine investigate the company that employed Mr Biden’s son.
- How damaging are Ukraine texts for Trump?
On Friday, US Ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland confirmed he would comply with a House subpoena to face the Democratic-led committees on 17 October.
Mr Sondland’s first scheduled appearance earlier this week was blocked by his bosses at the Department of State.
What’s the inquiry about?
According to the whistleblower’s complaint, some aides were concerned Mr Trump was soliciting interference from a foreign government for his own personal political interests during his White House call with President Zelensky.
- What Trump’s Ukraine phone call really means
Democrats have accused Mr Trump of withholding US aid while urging Ukraine to investigate corruption claims against his rival, 2020 Democratic contender Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, who worked with a Ukrainian gas company.
Officials in Kiev have said there is no evidence to support the allegation, which the Biden camp calls a smear.
The president denies any wrongdoing. On Thursday, Mr Zelensky also said there was “no blackmail” in the phone call.
Media playback is unsupported on your device
Zgłoś naruszenie/Błąd
Pozytywnie
Neutralnie 
Negatywnie
Lubię to!
Super
Ekscytujący 
Ciekawy
Smieszny
Smutny
Wściekły
Przerażony
Szokujący
Wzruszający
Rozczarowany
Zaskoczony
Prawda
Manipulacja
Fake news
Oryginalne źródło ZOBACZ
Dodaj kanał RSS
Musisz być zalogowanym aby zaproponować nowy kanal RSS