A A+ A++

We need the solutions used to transfer funds between companies in different countries, or even continents, to be more efficient. We see new business models with corporates moving from analogue to digital, rapid adoption of cloud platforms – yet when they want to pay a contractor on the other side of the globe, they often have to use solutions developed in the age of steam. Those mechanisms often mean that amount received by beneficiary and the timing of delivery is unclear at the beginning of the transaction. Not surprisingly, corporates are looking for faster, cheaper, more transparent, and more accessible cross border payments. The existing infrastructure will not be able to accommodate these needs.

What are the sources of these problems? What is the cross-border payment process like?

The world of business-to-business (B2B) bank transfers dates all the way back to the 19th Century. That’s when international trade began to pick up real pace; companies needed a way to move funds across national borders, and the correspondent banking system was born*. It was a pragmatic solution, which drew on the conventions and technologies of the time, but it had certain innate, structural limitations. Subsequent changes have helped to automate the process, but the underlying structure remains the same. The system is based on complicated correspondent and intermediate relationships. No matter how much innovation is thrown at it, those underlying problems will persist. So, it is perhaps ironic that, 200 years later, this system is still used to process the majority of the world’s international B2B transactions, valued at more than US$100 trillion a year**.

czytaj dalej

Oryginalne źródło: ZOBACZ
0
Udostępnij na fb
Udostępnij na twitter
Udostępnij na WhatsApp

Oryginalne źródło ZOBACZ

Subskrybuj
Powiadom o

Dodaj kanał RSS

Musisz być zalogowanym aby zaproponować nowy kanal RSS

Dodaj kanał RSS
0 komentarzy
Informacje zwrotne w treści
Wyświetl wszystkie komentarze
Poprzedni artykułWyrównanie świadczenia 500+ do 800 zł? To „fake news” – informuje ZUS
Następny artykułOPEC kłóci się z Międzynarodową Agencją Energii. ” Nadeszła chwila prawdy”?